"We can’t abdicate our position in the world for the next three years. So Republicans will have to resist the temptation to weaken him when the cost is weakening the country. A party that for at least two generations has held high the banner of American leadership and strength should not cast a vote that obviously risks a damaging erosion of this country’s stature and credibility abroad."
From Bill Kristol's explanation of why "yes" is the correct answer for Republicans.
Popular Posts
-
My daughter is fucking hilarious. She is starting to exhibit a wicked sense of humour. Somewhat lacking in verbal skills, she has yet to hon...
-
Robert Stacy McCain took issue with my use of the phrase "best fertility years": Professor Althouse, “the best fertility years of ...
-
One is tempted to respond with the immortal words, "no shit, Sherlock", to former chancellor Nigel Lawson's discovery that, ...
-
"We cannot determine all this. On some level, we’re assuming the reaction from Russia and Iraq and Syria will be zero: We’ll carry out ...
-
When I was pregnant I wrote a post about finding out the gender of our child. Hilariously, (because that is how I roll) the title was somew...
-
Members of the German government have been blowing hot and cold on treaty change for so long now that it is difficult to know what to make o...
-
Gradually working through yesterday's debate on the Address, one lights upon the contribution from Ed Balls , who tells us, "I want...
-
Booker and I have often referred to the establishment of the European Union as a slow-motion coup d'état , a revolution by any other na...
-
The europhile Independent wants us to believe that economics is more important than politics, giving a group of self-interested corporates...
-
It should not pass without comment that, the day after the House of Commons tortured itself on the question of reducing the power of the EU,...
