*
This week's Any Questions featured a revealing encounter between Jonathan Dimbleby and a member of the audience (a typically left-wing audience, but then it was from just outside Swansea.)
*
The questioner, a Mr Greg Wilkinson, offered the panel a choice of questions (war and peace or equality and inequality) - much to JD's surprise. Dimbleby wanted to be able to ask Labour leadership no-hoper John McDonnell about the Labour leadership and prompted Mr Wilkinson to use what was clearly the agreed question about the Labour leadership. The bolshie Mr Wilkinson was not playing ball: "I was given a question to ask, but that's my question. She said 'Any question', this is my question." He asked an anti-American, pro-European, anti-war question instead. (For more on Mr Wilkinson:
http://www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/news/Pensioner-picks-date-protest/article-594221-detail/article.html)
*
Jonathan Dimbleby, clearly embarrassed, returned to the subject shortly afterwards, as he thought that the listening public might be "puzzled" about this exchange. He thought, naturally, that the listening public might leap to the conclusion that Mr Wilkinson's "I was given a question to ask" meant that the show's producers sometimes give their own pre-prepared questions to the audience for them to ask on their behalf - which, if true, would completely undermine the show's credibility. (Haven't we all suspected that from time to time though? And even more so about its sister show - or should that be 'brother show'? - Question Time?)
*
JD explained that what Mr Wilkinson meant was that because the show gets large numbers of questions from the audience each week the producers must pick a handful to be read out. This is sort-of obvious, but it puts on record the fact that what gets asked and who is chosen to ask the questions is entirely at the discretion of the programme's producers. If a question attacking the coalition comes up first, or a question calling for the scrapping of Trident comes up third, that happens because the shows producers have chosen it to happen. If a left-wing, anti-Israeli protester (like Mr Wilkinson) gets called on to ask a question, that's because he has been picked by the show's producers. Everything is filtered through their lenses. There's nothing random about the show. All very obvious really, but sometimes the obvious goes unnoticed.
*
As further evidence for all this, and in blatant disregard for the very idea behind the show, Jonathan Dimbleby then - after the four panelists had finished holding forth on Mr Wilkinson's question - simply went ahead and put the question Mr Wilkinson was supposed to have asked to John McDonnell, regardless. The programme's agenda was not going to be derailed that easily!
*
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(15)
-
▼
May
(15)
- CLOSURE NOTICE
- EUROPIA THE BEAUTIFUL
- ANY QUESTIONS?
- THE BRANDENBURG BAIT
- SPECULATION
- A WARK DOWN (BAD) MEMORY LANE
- JIMS OF THE WORLD UNITE!
- ON YOUR MARKS
- WOE, WOE AND THRICE WOE!
- RIPPING UP HER REALITY CARD
- MORE PRO-LABOUR SPIN FROM THE BBC
- RIFTS IN THE CON-LIB CONTINUUM
- DID YOU FEEL SLIGHTLY DIRTY?
- THE XX FACTOR
- RIGHT ANGLES
-
▼
May
(15)
Popular Posts
-
My daughter is fucking hilarious. She is starting to exhibit a wicked sense of humour. Somewhat lacking in verbal skills, she has yet to hon...
-
Robert Stacy McCain took issue with my use of the phrase "best fertility years": Professor Althouse, “the best fertility years of ...
-
"We cannot determine all this. On some level, we’re assuming the reaction from Russia and Iraq and Syria will be zero: We’ll carry out ...
-
This comes in a New York Magazine interview. The interviewer immediately asks the simple question "Racist?" and Bloomberg says : W...
-
Why is he doing this ? 1. It gives each network something unique of its own to show on the night before Obama does his live address, so mayb...
-
"'Are we trying to change the world 900 students at a time, or are we preparing students for the world in which they are about to g...
-
Said the court that let the climate scientist Michael Mann — he of the "hockey stick" — to continue with his lawsuit against the N...
-
She put the last 8 years into a marriage, within which she expected to have babies and did not. Now, she's 38, and her window of fertili...
-
When I was pregnant I wrote a post about finding out the gender of our child. Hilariously, (because that is how I roll) the title was somew...
-
Said Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg , embracing a word I can't remember ever noticing before and a constitutional theory I've seen 1,00...